The paper must be an original, unpublished work written in English. The submitted paper should not have been published before or be under consideration for publication in another conference proceeding or journal. All authors whose names appear on the paper must have made substantial contributions to the scientific work and share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

All papers undergo a double blind peer-review process. Finally, the conference editors review each submission and may reject it if it does not meet the conference requirements, is not related to the conference subject matter, or is of poor quality. In the second stage of the review process, the paper is sent to an independent reviewer. Reviewers evaluate the paper and may recommend to accept it in its current form, with minor corrections, major corrections, or only after corrections and repeated review, or to reject it. Reviewers include their recommendations and comments, which are then sent to the author(s). The editors should not reverse decisions on publication unless serious problems are identified.

The list of references must be alphabetically arranged according to the first element in the line. All references cited in the text must be part of the reference list and vice versa. Use VANCOUVER SUPERSCRIPT style with DOI.

All submitted papers are checked by the editors to ensure compliance with the conference's ethical policies and requirements. The editors decide which papers to publish and are guided by the conference editorial team's policies and legal requirements such as copyright infringement and plagiarism. Papers that do not follow the ethical policy or conference requirements are rejected before the peer-review process. If a manuscript passes the editorial checks, it is assigned to an independent expert for double-blind peer review. Reviewers should be objective and have no conflict of interest. They should also point out relevant published work that is not yet cited.

Reviewers are asked to evaluate the paper and they may recommend to:

The length of full paper should be minimum 7000 words (single line spacing) and should follow the structure of Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion and Conclusion. Each participant may submit a maximum of two papers, one as the main author and one as a co-author.

The paper should include the following:

• Title of the paper.
• Author's full name and academic title(s).
• Author's complete affiliation, including the name of the department, faculty, and university, address, and email address. Please indicate the corresponding author if necessary.
• An abstract of 300 words to outline the paper's purpose, research methods, and crucial findings.
• Keywords, with a maximum of 5 words/phrases.

Technical Requirements:

Tables, figures, and equations should have separate numbering and be placed in the text at the appropriate paragraph, immediately after the reference. Equations must be typed using the Microsoft Equation 3.0 or MathType.

Only those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study reported should be listed as authors. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Acknowledgement or listing as contributors should be given to those who have participated in specific aspects of the research project. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that the manuscript is the authors' original work, that appropriate co-authors are included on the paper, that no inappropriate co-authors are included, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.